As you set out for Ithaca
hope that your journey is a long one,
full of adventure, full of discovery.
Laistrygonians and Cyclops,
angry Poseidon-don’t be afraid of them:
you’ll never find things like that on your way
as long as you keep your thoughts raised high,
as long as a rare sensasion
touches your spirit and your body.
Laistrygonians and Cyclops,
wild Poseidon-you won’t encounter them
unless you bring them along inside your soul,
unless your soul sets them up in front of you.

Hope that your journey is a long one.
May there be many summer mornings when,
with what pleasure, what joy,
you come into harbors you’re seeing for the first time;
may you stop at Phoenician trading stations
to buy fine things,
mother of pearl and coral, amber and ebony,
sensual perfume of every kind-
as many sensual perfumes as you can;
and may you visit many Egyptian cities
to learn and learn again from those who know.

Keep Ithaka always in your mind.
Arriving there is what you’re destined for.
But don’t hurry the journey at all.
Better if it lasts for years,
so that you’re old by the time you reach the island,
wealthy with all you’ve gained on the way,
not expecting Ithaca to make you rich.
Ithaca gave you the marvelous journey.
Without her you would have not set out.
She has nothing left to give you now.

And if you find her poor, Ithaca won’t have fooled you.
Wise as you will have become, so full of experience,
you’ll have understood by then what these Ithacas mean.

I just watched the American version of the Girl with the Dragon Tatoo and I liked it.

It was surprising because this girl:

Was not this girl:

Lisbeth is a great character – a female knight, lonely, lost and vulnerable but also sometimes menacing.

In the final scene she watches from the shadows as Daniel Craig – a sympathetic journalist type – walks hand in hand with the CEO of the newspaper he works for into the distance.

As far as role reversals go, it’s one that feels authentic.

Over the weekend, the Obama administration issued a potentially game-changing statementon the blacklist bills, saying it would oppose PIPA and SOPA as written, and drew an important line in the sand by emphasizing that it “will not support” any bill “that reduces freedom of expression, increases cybersecurity risk, or undermines the dynamic, innovative global Internet.”

Yet, the fight is still far from over. Even though the New York Times reported that the White House statement “all but kill[s] current versions of the legislation,” the Senate is still poised to bring PIPA to the floor next week, and we can expect SOPA proponents in the House to try to revive the legislation—unless they get the message that these initiatives must stop, now.  So let’s take a look at the dangerous provisions in the blacklist bills that would violate the White House’s own principles by damaging free speech, Internet security, and online innovation:

The Anti-Circumvention Provision

In addition to going after websites allegedly directly involved in copyright infringement, a proposal in SOPA will allow the government to target sites that simply provide information that could help users get around the bills’ censorship mechanisms. Such a provision would not only amount to an unconstitutional prior restraint against protected speech, but would severely damage online innovation. And contrary to claims by SOPA’s supporters, this provision—at least what’s been proposed so far—applies to all websites, even those in the U.S.

As First Amendment expert Marvin Ammori points out, “The language is pretty vague, but it appears all these companies must monitor their sites for anti-circumvention so they are not subject to court actions ‘enjoining’ them from continuing to provide ‘such product or service.’” That means social media sites like Facebook or YouTube—basically any site with user generated content—would have to police their own sites, forcing huge liability costs onto countless Internet companies. This is exactly why venture capitalists have said en masse they won’t invest in online startups if PIPA and SOPA pass. Websites would be forced to block anything from a user post about browser add-ons like DeSopa, to a simple list of IP addresses of already-blocked sites.

Perhaps worse, EFF has detailed how this provision would also decimate the open source software community. Anyone who writes or distributes Virtual Private Network, proxy, privacy or anonymization software would be negatively affected. This includes organizations that are funded by the State Department to create circumvention software to help democratic activists get around authoritarian regimes’ online censorship mechanisms. Ironically, SOPA would not only institute the same practices as these regimes, but would essentially outlaw the tools used by activists to circumvent censorship in countries like Iran and China as well.

The “Vigilante” Provision

Another dangerous provision in PIPA and SOPA that hasn’t received a lot of attention is the “vigilante” provision, which would grant broad immunity to all service providers if they overblock innocent users or block sites voluntarily with no judicial oversight at all. The standard for immunity is incredibly low and the potential for abuse is off the charts. Intermediaries only need to act “in good faith” and base their decision “on credible evidence” to receive immunity.

As we noted months ago, this provision would allow the MPAA and RIAA to create literal blacklists of sites they want censored. Intermediaries will find themselves under pressure to act to avoid court orders, creating a vehicle for corporations to censor sites—even those in the U.S.—without any legal oversight. And as Public Knowledge has pointed out, not only can this provision be used for bogus copyright claims that are protected by fair use, but large corporations can take advantage of it to stamp out emerging competitors and skirt anti-trust laws:

For instance, an Internet service provider could block DNS requests for a website offering online video that competed with its cable television offerings, based upon “credible evidence” that the site was, in its own estimation, promoting its use for infringement….While the amendment requires that the action be taken in good faith, the blocked site now bears the burden of proving either its innocence or the bad faith of its accuser in order to be unblocked.

Corporate Right of Action

PIPA and SOPA also still allow copyright holders to get an unopposed court order to cut off foreign websites from payment processors and advertisers. As we have continually highlighted, copyright holders already can remove infringing material from the web under the DMCA notice-and-takedown procedure. Unfortunately, we’ve seen that power abused time and again. Yet the proponents of PIPA and SOPA want to give rightsholders even more power, allowing them to essentially shut down full sites instead of removing the specific infringing content.

While this provision only affects foreign sites, it still affects Americans’ free speech rights. As Marvin Ammori explained, “The seminal case of Lamont v. Postmaster makes it clear that Americans have the First Amendment right to read and listen to foreign speech, even if the foreigners lack a First Amendment speech right.” If history is any guide—and we’re afraid it is—we will see specious claims to wholesale take downs of legitimate and protected speech.

Expanded Attorney General Powers

PIPA and SOPA would also give the Attorney General new authority to block domain name services, a provision that has been universally criticized by both Internet security experts and First Amendment scholars. Even the blacklist bills’ authors are now publicly second-guessingthat scary provision. But even without it, this section would still force many intermediaries to become the Internet police by putting the responsibility of censorship enforcement on those intermediaries, who are usually innocent third parties.

The Attorney General would also be empowered to de-list websites from search engines, which, as Google Chairman Eric Schmidt noted, would still “criminalize linking and the fundamental structure of the Internet itself.”  The same applies to payment processors and advertisers.

These are just some of the egregious provisions in PIPA and SOPA that would drastically change the way we use the Internet (for the worse), and punish millions of innocent users who have never even thought about copyright infringement. As Reddit co-founder Alexis Ohanianexplained, PIPA and SOPA are “the equivalent of being angry and trying to take action against Ford just because a Mustang was used in a bank robbery.” These bills must be stopped if we want to protect free speech and innovation on the web.

]]> http://shoofeemafi.com/control-control-control/feed/ 1 http://shoofeemafi.com/occupy-london-in-video/ http://shoofeemafi.com/occupy-london-in-video/#comments Tue, 17 Jan 2012 07:41:07 +0000 shoofeemafi http://shoofeemafi.com/?p=1829 I bumped into Occupy London by chance earlier in the month. For images, check out a previous post here.

St. Paul’s was one of the only buildings in the Capital to avoid being hit during the Second World War.

View Larger Map

But in 2011 this happened, and visiting the Cathedral became a little bit different:

The City of London wanted to move the protesters out. The only problem was, they’d set up their tents on Church land. This created some pretty fierce debate – but so far the Occupy London camp has survived.

They have their own university.

Their own typewriter.

And their own library too.

The people seemed harmless. They offered me coffee.

But they had ideas that not everyone might like.

There seemed to be a connection with the Middle East ~> with the Arab Spring & Palestine.

And maybe even a sense of community.

But what did they want?

I found a wish list here:

When you’re a genius you can get away with this kind of stuff. Like i always say, all the best things in life are completely irrational.

I got invited to go see the play by the National Centre for Culture and Arts of the King Hussein Foundation – and part of the reason I’m writing this post is because I’d didn’t really know anything about their cultural activities. Apparently the centre has pioneered dance and theatre in Jordan for quite some time – which is great.

I inevitably arrived late and spent most of the time standing up, but still enjoyed it – as did a packed hall at the Royal Cultural Center.

There must be others out there too, so get in touch and we can connect the dots… next year it could be ‘Waltz of the Sand Dunes‘.

Tchaikovsky would be stoked.

One of the most interesting things has been the whole Occupy movement. Just generally:

(1) I like the art work and the posters.

(2) It’s interesting seeing the same libertarian arguments once leveled against ‘foreign tyrants’ in colonial times being leveled against corporations today. It’s like the ‘land of the free’ has woken up to figure out someone’s been jinxing it…. there’s a lot of Thomas Paine and Jefferson being quoted. In London people are camped outside St. Paul’s and you’re getting this kind of debate.

(3) Even Hollywood is getting in on the act:

The second found that individuals don’t measure their wealth in objective terms – instead people measure how rich they are in relation to those around them. So the study found that being rich wasn’t about having ‘X’ – it was about having X more than Y.

A lot of 2011 has been spent watching medieval social grievances against modern day nobles and serf like systems of government play out in twenty first century terms: through design, cell phones, the internet, and even movies.